IPCRF_T1-T3_SY-2023-2024-BLANK-1.docx
•Download as DOCX, PDF•
22 likes•36,831 views
This document is a mid-year review form for evaluating the performance of teacher Amor P. Gonzales at Tambo Elementary School in Camarines Sur. It outlines their key result areas, objectives, performance targets, means of verification, and ratings. The form is used to assess the teacher's content knowledge, learning environment, curriculum planning, assessment/reporting skills, and professional development. Objectives are evaluated on quality, efficiency, and timeliness. The teacher and principal provide ratings and remarks on progress toward objectives at the mid-year point.
Report
Share
More Related Content
What's hot
What's hot (20)
Similar to IPCRF_T1-T3_SY-2023-2024-BLANK-1.docx
Similar to IPCRF_T1-T3_SY-2023-2024-BLANK-1.docx (20)
Recently uploaded
Recently uploaded (20)
IPCRF_T1-T3_SY-2023-2024-BLANK-1.docx
- 1. MID-YEAR REVIEW FORM (MRF) for Teacher I-III Name of Employee: AMOR P. GONZALES Position: CEO😊 Bureau/Center/Service/Division: DEPED CAMARINES SUR /TAMBO ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Rating Period: SY 2023-2024 Name of Rater: Position: Date of Review: _________________________ MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight per KRA Means of Verification Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review Results Performance Target Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Rating Remarks Rating Remarks Basic Education Services 1. Content Knowledge and Pedagogy 1. Applied knowledge of content within and across curriculum teaching areas. 21% 1. Classroom Observation Tool (COT) rating sheets or Inter- observer agreement forms done through on-site/ face-to-face/ in- person classroom observation. If onsite/face-to-face/in-person classes are not implemented, • through observation of synchronous/asynchronous teaching in other modalities; or • through observation of a demonstration teaching* via LAC session. Quality Efficiency Timeliness 2. Used a range of teaching strategies that enhance learner achievement in literacy and numeracy skills. 1. Classroom Observation Tool (COT) rating sheets or Inter- observer agreement forms done through on-site/ face-to-face/ in- person classroom observation. If onsite/face-to-face/in-person classes are not implemented, • through observation of synchronous/asynchronous teaching in other modalities; or • through observation of a demonstration teaching* via LAC session. Quality Efficiency Timeliness
- 2. MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight per KRA Means of Verification Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review Results Performance Target Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Rating Remarks Rating Remarks 3. Applied a range of teaching strategies to develop critical and creative thinking, as well as other higher-order thinking skills. 1. Classroom Observation Tool (COT) rating sheets or Inter- observer agreement forms done through on-site/ face-to-face/ in- person classroom observation. If onsite/face-to-face/in-person classes are not implemented, • through observation of synchronous/asynchronous teaching in other modalities; or • through observation of a demonstration teaching* via LAC session. Quality Efficiency Timeliness Basic Education Services 2. Learning Environment and Diversity of Learners 4. Displayed proficient use of Mother Tongue, Filipino and English to facilitate teaching and learning. 21% 1. Classroom Observation Tool (COT) rating sheets or Inter- observer agreement forms done through on-site/ face-to-face/ in- person classroom observation. If onsite/face-to-face/in-person classes are not implemented, • through observation of synchronous/asynchronous teaching in other modalities; or • through observation of a demonstration teaching* via LAC session. Quality Efficiency Timeliness 5. Established safe and secure learning environments to enhance learning through the consistent implementation of policies, guidelines and procedures. 1. Classroom Observation Tool (COT) rating sheets or Inter- observer agreement forms done through on-site/ face-to-face/ in- person classroom observation. If onsite/face-to-face/in-person classes are not implemented, Quality Efficiency
- 3. MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight per KRA Means of Verification Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review Results Performance Target Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Rating Remarks Rating Remarks • through observation of synchronous/asynchronous teaching in other modalities; or • through observation of a demonstration teaching* via LAC session. Timeliness 6. Maintained learning environments that promote fairness, respect and care to encourage learning. 1. Classroom Observation Tool (COT) rating sheets or Inter- observer agreement forms done through on-site/ face-to-face/ in- person classroom observation. If onsite/face-to-face/in-person classes are not implemented, • through observation of synchronous/asynchronous teaching in other modalities; or • through observation of a demonstration teaching* via LAC session. Quality Efficiency Timeliness Basic Education Services 3. Curriculum and Planning 7. Established a learner-centered culture by using teaching strategies that respond to their linguistic, cultural, socio- economic and religious backgrounds. 21% 1. Classroom Observation Tool (COT) rating sheets or Inter- observer agreement forms done through on-site/ face-to-face/ in- person classroom observation. If onsite/face-to-face/in-person classes are not implemented, • through observation of synchronous/asynchronous teaching in other modalities; or • though observation of a demonstration teaching* via LAC session Quality Efficiency Timeliness
- 4. MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight per KRA Means of Verification Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review Results Performance Target Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Rating Remarks Rating Remarks 8. Adapted and used culturally appropriate teaching strategies to address the needs of learners from indigenous groups. 1. Classroom Observation Tool (COT) rating sheets or Inter- observer agreement forms done through on-site/ face-to-face/ in- person classroom observation. If onsite/face-to-face/in-person classes are not implemented, • through observation of synchronous/asynchronous teaching in other modalities; or • though observation of a demonstration teaching* via LAC session Quality Efficiency Timeliness 9. Set achievable and appropriate learning outcomes that are aligned with learning competencies. At least one(1) lesson plan(e.g.,DLP,DLL,WHLP,WLP, WLL, lesson ELemplars,and the likes) or one lesson from a self- learning module,developed by the ratee and used in instruction with achievable and appropriate learning outcomes that are aligned with the learning competencies as shown in any one (1) of the following: Lecture/discussion Activity/activity sheet Performance Task Rubric for assessing performance using criteria that appropriately describe the target output. Quality Efficiency Timeliness
- 5. MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight per KRA Means of Verification Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review Results Performance Target Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Rating Remarks Rating Remarks Basic Education Services 4. Assessment and Reporting 10. Used strategies for providing timely, accurate and constructive feedback to improve learner performance. 21% 1. Classroom Observation Tool (COT) rating sheets or Inter- observer agreement forms done through on-site/ face-to- face/ in-person classroom observation. If onsite/face-to-face/in-person classes are not implemented, • through observation of synchronous/asynchronous teaching in other modalities; or • though observation of a demonstration teaching* via LAC session Quality Efficiency Timeliness 11. Utilized assessment data to inform the modification of teaching and learning practices and programs. A list of identified least/most mastered skills based on the frequency errors/correct responses with any none (1) of the following supporting MOVs 1. Accomplishment report for remedial/ Enhancementm Activities (e.g.,remedial session sessions, Summer Reading Camp, Phil-IRI-based reading program) 2. Intervention materials used for remediation/reinforcement/ Enhancement 3.lesson plan/activity log for remediation/enhancement utilizing of assessment data to modify teaching and learning practices or programs. Quality Efficiency Timeliness
- 6. MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight per KRA Means of Verification Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review Results Performance Target Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Rating Remarks Rating Remarks 12. Build relationships with parents/guardians and the wider school community to facilitate involvement in the educative process. Any one (1) of the following: 1. Proof of participation in any activity highlighting the objective, such as, but not limited the following: Receipt form/monitoring form during distribution of learning materials,etc. Commitment form to stakeholders, developed advocacy materials, certificate of participation that shows parents’/stakeholders’ engagement signed by the school head,etc. Home Visitation forms Any Equivalent ALS form/document that highlights the objective Others (please specify and provide annotations) 2. Parent-teacher log or proof of other stakeholders meeting(e.g.,one-on- one parent-teacher learner conference log; attendance sheet with minutes of online or face-to-face meeting; proof of Quality Efficiency Timeliness
- 7. involvement in the learners’/parents’ orientation,etc.) 3. Any form of communication to parents/stakeholders( e.g. notice of meeting; screenshot of chat/text message/ Communication with parent/guardian) MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight per KRA Means of Verification Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review Results Performance Target Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Rating Remarks Rating Remarks Basic Education Services 5. Personal Growth and Professional Development 13. Participated in Professional networks to share knowledge and to enhance practice. 14% 1. Certificate of completion in a course/training 2. Certificate of participation in a webinar, retooling, upskilling, and other training/seminar/ Workshop with proof of implementation. 3. Certificate of recognition/ Speakership in a webinar and other training/seminar/ Workshop. 4. Any proof of participation to a benchmarking activity 5. Any proof of participation in school LAC sessions (online/face-to-face) certified by the LAC Coordinator 6. Others (please specify and provide annotations) Quality Efficiency Timeliness 14. Developed a personal Quality
- 8. improvement plan based on reflection of one’s practice and ongoing professional learning. 1. Certification from the ICT Coordinator/ School Head/ Focal Person in charge of e-SAT 2. IPCRF-DP 3. Midyear Review Form (MRF) 4. Updated IPCRF-DP Phase II Efficiency Timeliness Basic Education Services Plus Factor 15. Performed various related works/ activities that contribute to the teaching- learning process. 2% Any one (1) proof of: • Committee involvement • Involvement as module/ learning material writer/ validator • Involvement as a resource person/ speaker/ learning facilitator in the RO/ SDO/ school-initiated TV/Radio-based instruction • Book or journal authorship/ co- authorship/ contributorship • Advisorship/ coordinatorship/ chairpersonship Quality Efficiency MFOs KRAs Objectives Timeline Weight per KRA Means of Verification Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year Review Results Performance Target Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Rating Remarks Rating Remarks • Participation in demonstration teaching Timeliness
- 9. • Participation as research presenter in a forum/ conference • Mentoring of pre-service/ in-service teachers • Conducted research within the rating period Others(please specify) with annotation on how it contributed to the teaching-learning process. ADJECTIVAL RATING EQUIVALENCES RANGE ADJECTIVAL RATING 4.500-5.000 Outstanding 3.500-4.499 Very Satisfactory 2.500-3.499 Satisfactory 1.500-2.499 Unsatisfactory Below 1.499 Poor AMOR P. GONZALES Ratee Rater Approving Authority