Public administration emerged as an academic discipline in the late 19th century with Woodrow Wilson's seminal essay. It has evolved through 5 phases: (1) a politics-administration dichotomy from 1887-1926, (2) an era focused on principles of administration from 1927-1937, (3) a period of challenges to those principles from 1938-1947 with human relations theory, (4) a crisis of identity from 1948-1970 addressed by new public administration, and (5) a public policy perspective emerging from 1971 onward incorporating various social sciences. Recent trends include new public management, public-private partnerships, and greater citizen participation.
This document discusses different approaches to comparative politics, including traditional and structural-functional approaches. It outlines four traditional approaches: the philosophical approach, which uses deductive reasoning; the historical approach, which studies historical context; the institutional approach, which compares government institutions; and the legal approach, which treats states as organizations for law. It then describes the structural-functional approach, which views political systems as institutions that interact within a dynamic relationship to other systems and require feedback mechanisms.
This document summarizes theories in public administration from 1800 to 1980. It covers the classical era from 1800-1950s which was based on scientific management, bureaucracy, and administrative management. Theories included Frederick Taylor's scientific management, Max Weber's bureaucracy, and Henri Fayol's 14 principles of management. The neoclassical era from the 1920s-1930s incorporated the human element and included theories from Mary Parker Follett, Chester Barnard, and Elton Mayo. Abraham Maslow introduced the hierarchy of needs and Frederick Herzberg the motivation-hygiene theory. Douglas McGregor proposed theory X and theory Y. The modern era integrated the classical and human relations approaches and included decision making theory from Herbert Simon and industrial human
Max weber’s theory of bureaucracy and its criticismJulpahan
Max Weber developed a theory of bureaucracy that defined its key features as a formal rational system intended to maximize efficiency. These features include a clear division of labor, a well-defined hierarchy of authority, impersonal relationships based on positions rather than personalities, and an emphasis on rules and standard operating procedures. While bureaucracy aims to increase rationality and efficiency, it has also been criticized for being too rigid and rule-bound, hindering flexibility and informal communication within organizations. Weber acknowledged that bureaucracy is not the only way to structure modern institutions rationally.
Easton constructed a systems theory model of politics that defines the basic processes of any political system. The model views the political system as converting "inputs" from the environment, like demands and support from citizens, into "outputs" like policies, plans and programs. There is also "feedback" as citizens react to outputs. The environment outside the political system also influences inputs, decision-making, outputs and feedback. However, critics argue the model presents an overly mechanical and rigid view of politics that better describes stable democracies and has a "black box" view of how decisions are made inside the political system.
The document discusses the evolution of paradigms and models in public administration from its early development to present. It traces the progression from the politics-administration dichotomy model to more modern concepts like New Public Management, Reinventing Government, and governance. Key models discussed include scientific management, systems theory, and the policy issue model, each building upon previous approaches and introducing new lenses for analyzing public administration.
David Easton's Concept of Decline of Political TheoryRima Doot
David Easton argued that political theory was in decline for several reasons:
1) Historicism - Theorists were too focused on history and past events rather than analyzing current issues and how to address problems. They lacked a positive or creative outlook.
2) Moral relativism - Theorists took a relativistic view and did not attempt to determine absolute truths. They accepted prevailing ideas without critique.
3) Hyper-factualism - Theories were based too heavily on facts without a strong theoretical foundation. Theorists focused only on easily researchable problems rather than developing new perspectives.
4) Positivism - New political ideologies in the 19th-20th century took the
Understanding Bureaucracy in Public AdministrationHAFIZUDIN YAHAYA
Basic noted for you to understand the concept and practice of bureaucracy in government administration. what is the factors that lead to failure of bureaucracy and how to enhance the better management in public policy.
The document summarizes the evolution of the field of public administration from traditional to modern phases. It discusses key thinkers and developments that shaped the field, including Woodrow Wilson's politics-administration dichotomy, Frank Goodnow's examination of the dichotomy, and Leonard White's influential early textbook. It also outlines Max Weber's analysis of bureaucratic organizations and principles of bureaucracy. The summary traces the historical roots and changing paradigms that have influenced public administration theory and practice over time.
This document discusses human resource management practices in public enterprises in Pakistan. It begins by defining human resource management and the public sector. It then compares public and private sector management in terms of ownership, objectives, leadership, and accountability. The document outlines the evolution of New Public Management, which aims to improve public sector efficiency and effectiveness by adopting private sector practices. It discusses principles of NPM like decentralization, competition, and performance standards. The document analyzes HRM reforms in Pakistan's public sector enterprises and the challenges of adopting private sector practices due to political and cultural differences.
This document discusses the concepts of legitimacy, sovereignty, and authority. It defines legitimacy as both the legal right to govern but also the psychological right in people's minds. Legitimacy refers to whether a government's rule is viewed as rightful. Sovereignty originally referred to a monarch's power but now means national control over a country's territory. Authority is the ability of leaders to get others to obey based on their legitimate power. Where legitimacy is weak, sovereignty and authority are also likely to erode as people feel less obligation to obey the government.
Development administration emerged in the 1960s to help implement policies and plans for nation-building and socio-economic progress in developing countries. It aims to strengthen administrative machinery to facilitate defined programs of social and economic progress by making change attractive to populations. Key elements include planned and coordinated efforts, a goal-oriented and people-centered approach, and creating management capacities. Problems include a lack of experienced administrators and modern techniques as well as procedural delays and poor implementation. The nature of development has changed from a 19th century focus on individualism and economic growth to a post-WWII emphasis on state-led development and goals like poverty reduction, self-reliance, and resource mobilization.
The parliamentary system is a form of government where the legislature or parliament is the supreme body, and the executive branch derives its power from and is accountable to the legislature. Key features include a stable majority government, collective and individual ministerial responsibility, the prime minister as the leader of the government, and mutual toleration between political parties. While it has advantages like cooperation between the parliament and cabinet and responsiveness to public opinion, it also has potential drawbacks like cabinet dictatorship, unstable governments without a majority, and difficulty forming governments in multiparty systems. Overall, parliamentary government is considered better than other systems because the cabinet must maintain the support of parliament.
New Public Management and Reinventing Government emerged in the 1980s and 1990s as responses to economic problems and a desire for more efficient and cost-effective government. Key aspects included being more customer-oriented, decentralizing authority, and applying private sector business models to government. The new public management movement advocated for competition, quantifying performance, and giving managers more autonomy. Reinventing Government proposed operating governments like businesses to improve outcomes. Reengineering sought radical improvements to processes through exploiting technology. These reforms aimed to improve productivity and services while reducing costs.
Public administration involves the implementation of government policies and operations, including planning, organizing, directing, coordinating, and controlling government work. It has evolved over time from focusing on separating politics and administration, to emphasizing principles of administration and efficiency, to considering human factors and incorporating other social sciences. Public administration is significant as the key instrument of government to maintain order and protect citizens. It also enables development, supports modern welfare states by providing public services, and is an important subject of academic study.
Approaches to the study of Public AdministrationBhargav Dangar
The document outlines several approaches to studying public administration, including the normative approach which focuses on what administration should be, the empirical approach which analyzes actual administrative situations, and the philosophical, legal, historical, case method, institutional/structural, and behavioural approaches. The legal approach uses laws framed by society in countries like France, Germany, and Belgium. The case method reconstructs administrative realities through narratives of real events.
The document discusses the emergence of New Public Administration (NPA) in the late 1960s from the Minnowbrook Conference in 1968. The NPA rejected classical theories of public administration and advocated for social equity in addition to efficiency and effectiveness. It also questioned the relevance of traditional public administration and argued for more focus on social purposes and values rather than just economic factors. The NPA called for more client-oriented, participatory, and decentralized approaches with less bureaucracy. While social equity has gained more acceptance since NPA, it still struggles to be viewed equally alongside other core values of public administration like economy, efficiency, and effectiveness.
New Public Management (NPM) emerged in the 1980s as an administrative reform approach that sought to improve public sector management by importing private sector business concepts and values. Key elements of NPM include an emphasis on hands-on management, explicit performance standards and measures, output controls rather than input controls, increased competition and contracting, and cost-cutting efficiency. For NPM approaches to be successful, a country requires a reasonable level of economic development, an established rule of law and judicial system, a functioning Weberian bureaucratic system, and strong state institutional, technical, and administrative capacity.
The document discusses the development of administration and public administration. It outlines several key points:
1) Development administration emerged in the post-1945 era to address the needs of newly independent developing countries and their development schemes.
2) Development administration is change-oriented, goal-oriented, promotes citizen participation, and takes a holistic approach to development.
3) Traditional public administration is more parochial and lacks positive thinking, while development administration is innovative, experimental, and field-oriented.
The document discusses the evolution of public administration from ancient to modern times. It covers the following key points:
- Public administration has existed in all societies to advance general welfare through activities like taxation, financial management, and administering justice. The idea of serving the public interest can be seen as far back as the Code of Hammurabi.
- Notable developments included China establishing the first centralized bureaucracy in the 2nd century BC and merit-based civil service exams. In the late 19th century, Woodrow Wilson distinguished between politics and an apolitical administration.
- The field of public administration transitioned from an art to an attempt at a science through the works of scholars like Gulick, White
This document discusses the evolution of public administration theories and practices. It covers the development of public administration and three main theories: Classical Public Administration Theory, New Public Management Theory, and Postmodern Public Administration Theory. It also describes six paradigms of traditional public administration models and how public administration has taken on new roles in modern society, including designing policy, implementing policy, and serving as an agent of change.
This document discusses the evolution of public administration theories and practices. It covers the development of public administration and three main theories: Classical Public Administration Theory, New Public Management Theory, and Postmodern Public Administration Theory. It also describes six paradigms of traditional public administration models and how public administration has taken on new roles in modern society, including designing policy, implementing policy, and serving as a change agent.
The New Public Administration emerged in the 1960s as a response to the traditional, managerial approach of public administration. It focused on making public administration more responsive to social issues and promoting values like social equity, fairness, and participation. The Minnowbrook Conference of 1968 was influential in developing the principles of the New Public Administration, emphasizing public administration's role in facilitating social change and an active citizenry. The New Public Administration rejected the value-neutral stance and hierarchical structure of traditional public administration, instead prioritizing flexibility, relevance to contemporary problems, and a client-oriented approach.
Woodrow Wilson is considered the father of public administration for his 1887 work "The Study of Administration", which established administration as its own academic discipline separate from politics. Frank Goodnow later argued that politics and administration could be separated, with politics dealing with policy and administration dealing with execution. Early 20th century saw focus on efficiency and development of principles of administration. Later challenges rejected the separation of administration and politics, and viewed administration as operating within political and social contexts. Recent trends include comparative public administration, development administration, and market-oriented approaches. Comparative public administration involves comparing administrative systems and specific elements across countries.
The document summarizes the evolution of public administration over five phases from 1887 to the present:
1) 1887-1926 saw early reforms and the first textbook on the topic. Politics and administration were seen as distinct.
2) 1927-1937 focused on applying scientific management principles from business. A dichotomy between facts and values emerged.
3) 1938-1959 challenged the universality of administrative principles and the politics-administration dichotomy.
4) 1950-1970 sought to reconnect public administration with its political science roots and broaden its social and political focus.
5) Post-1970 solidified public administration as its own discipline focused on decision-making and defining "public." Recent technological changes
This document summarizes the evolution of public administration over five phases from 1887 to the present:
1) 1887-1926 saw early reforms and the first textbook on public administration. Politics and administration were considered separate, with administrators implementing policy and politicians making it.
2) 1927-1937 focused on scientific management principles. Books defined optimal assembly lines for efficiency.
3) 1938-1959 challenged the dichotomy between politics and administration and questioned universal principles. Values could not be separated from administration.
4) 1950-1970 saw efforts to reconnect public administration with its political science roots to avoid being too narrow of a science. Comparative administration also emerged.
5) After 1970, public administration refined management techniques
This document summarizes the evolution of public administration over five phases from 1887 to the present:
1) 1887-1926 saw early reforms and the first textbook on public administration. Politics and administration were considered separate, with administrators implementing policy and politicians making it.
2) 1927-1937 focused on scientific management principles. A key book defined principles of optimal assembly lines for efficiency.
3) 1938-1959 challenged the dichotomy between politics and administration and questioned universal principles. Authors argued administration involves values and contexts differ between organizations.
4) 1950-1970 saw efforts to reconnect public administration with its political science roots by considering both internal bureaucratic processes and external political pressures.
5) Post-1970 utilized
1) In the 1830s, Alexis de Tocqueville observed the phenomenon of individualism in America, which he contrasted with the egoism he saw in Europe.
2) The progressive movement led to reforms like the Pendleton Act in 1883, which professionalized the civil service through a merit-based hiring system.
3) There have been various attempts to define public administration, with scholars focusing on elements like its role in policymaking, fiscal administration, and organization and management of government. Its relationship to political science has also been an ongoing topic of discussion.
The Contribution of Charles E. Merriam, for public Policytamene1976
Charles E. Merriam was a political scientist in the early 20th century who advocated for applying scientific methods to the study and practice of government and public policy. He helped establish the Social Science Research Council in the 1920s to develop techniques for testing policy assumptions and solutions. Merriam believed social scientists could improve political debates by objectively evaluating policies. He wanted to bridge the gap between political theory and real-world practice of government. Merriam's efforts influenced the development of behavioralism in political science, which applied methods from the natural sciences to the objective study of human behavior and policymaking.
The document summarizes the evolution of paradigms in public administration from 1900 to the present. It discusses 6 paradigms: 1) Politics/Administration Dichotomy from 1900-1926 which saw PA emerge as a discipline; 2) Principles of Administration from 1926-1937 focused on scientific management; 3) PA as a Political Science from 1950-1970 as it was situated within political science departments; 4) PA as Management from 1956-1970 emphasized organizational theory and management; 5) PA as Public Administration from 1970 onward reestablished PA as an independent field; and 6) From Government to Governance from 1990 which broadened the concept to additional actors. The future of digital governance is also discussed.
Public Administration has evolved through five stages:
1. Era of Orthodoxy (1887-1926) characterized the politics-administration dichotomy.
2. Principles of Administration (1927-1937) focused on universal principles of efficiency.
3. As Political Science (1938-1947) when behavioral thinkers challenged rational assumptions.
4. As Administrative Science (1948-1970) addressing postwar challenges and cross-cultural studies.
5. New Public Management (1971-present) emphasized reinventing government through privatization and deregulation.
The discipline was influenced by several theorists and developed differently in the Philippine context due to Spanish and American colonialism.
Public administration has evolved over five phases from 1887 to the present:
1. 1887-1926 focused on separating public administration from political science and defining its role. Woodrow Wilson provided an early definition.
2. 1927-1937 established public administration as a social science with a focus on administrative principles and theories.
3. 1938-1947 challenged the idea of a dichotomy between politics and administration and questioned if it was a true science.
4. 1948-1970 was a crisis period as the distinction between politics and administration became blurred.
5. 1971-present has seen a focus on dynamics, interdisciplinarity, and new trends like comparative administration and market orientation. Public administration continues to develop
This document provides an overview of the introductory unit in an urban sociology masters program. It covers the historical background of sociology, defining it as a social science that studies human social structure and activity using systematic empirical methods. It discusses the emergence of sociology in response to the French Revolution, industrial revolution, and success of natural sciences. The founders of sociology presented include Comte, Durkheim, Marx, Spencer, and Weber. The objectives and significance of learning sociology are also outlined, noting how it provides a sociological imagination to understand social influences and apply knowledge to social issues.
The document discusses a paper written by a student named Abhinav Kapur at Washington and Lee University. The paper analyzes China's departure from Maoism and argues that market reforms were a more bottom-up process initiated by citizens, rather than solely resulting from Deng Xiaoping's rise to power. The paper uses a path dependency approach to analyze how Mao's policies of self-reliance, decentralization, and encouragement of citizen initiative planted the seeds for citizens to demand reforms through collective action.
Similar to Evolution of Public Administration in Indian Context (20)
Doledge India, a leading service provider, recognizes the importance of addressing Doledge India Consumer Complaints to maintain trust and satisfaction. This presentation outlines the measures taken to resolve common consumer concerns effectively.
A Closer Look at the Role of Darshan Hiranandani .pptx" is likely a PowerPoint presentation providing insights into Darshan Hiranandani's impactful contributions and leadership in sectors such as real estate and energy infrastructure. It likely highlights his strategies, innovations, and influence on economic development in India.
72402X: Avaya Meetings Server Support Exam QuestionsNWEXAM
Start Here--- https://tinyurl.com/bdf7zmuf ---Get complete detail on 72402X exam guide to crack Avaya Meetings Server Support (ACSS-7241). You can collect all information on 72402X tutorial, practice test, books, study material, exam questions, and syllabus. Firm your knowledge on Avaya Meetings Server Support (ACSS-7241) and get ready to crack 72402X certification. Explore all information on 72402X exam with number of questions, passing percentage and time duration to complete test.
Violation of publication ethics by Rajdeepdrxrajdeep
Certainly! Violation of publication ethics is a critical issue within academic and scientific communities, encompassing various forms of misconduct that can undermine the integrity and reliability of research. This comprehensive exploration will delve into different types of publication ethics violations, their consequences, and measures to prevent such breaches.
### Introduction
Publication ethics forms the foundation of scholarly integrity, ensuring that research is conducted and disseminated in a transparent, honest, and responsible manner. Violations of these ethics not only damage individual reputations but also erode trust in the scientific enterprise as a whole. This essay aims to explore the various dimensions of publication ethics violations, highlighting their impact on research integrity and suggesting strategies for prevention.
### Types of Publication Ethics Violations
#### 1. Plagiarism
Plagiarism involves using someone else's ideas, words, or work without proper acknowledgment. It can range from direct copying to paraphrasing without citation. Plagiarism undermines academic honesty and misrepresents the originality of research contributions.
#### 2. Fabrication and Falsification
Fabrication refers to inventing data or results that do not exist, while falsification involves manipulating research data or methods to achieve desired outcomes. Both practices distort the truth and compromise the reliability of research findings.
#### 3. Duplicate Publication
Publishing the same research findings in multiple journals without disclosure is considered duplicate publication. This practice misleads readers and wastes valuable resources by inflating the perceived impact of research.
#### 4. Authorship Issues
Issues related to authorship include ghost authorship (where someone who contributed significantly is not listed) and guest authorship (where someone who did not contribute significantly is listed). Proper attribution of authorship is crucial for accountability and recognition.
#### 5. Conflict of Interest
Conflicts of interest arise when financial or personal considerations could unduly influence research conduct or reporting. Failure to disclose such conflicts can compromise the objectivity and credibility of research.
### Consequences of Publication Ethics Violations
#### 1. Damage to Academic Integrity
Violations erode trust in researchers, institutions, and the scholarly publishing process. They undermine the credibility of scientific findings and hinder the advancement of knowledge.
#### 2. Legal and Professional Repercussions
Depending on the severity and context, publication ethics violations can lead to legal consequences, such as lawsuits for copyright infringement or fraud. Professionally, researchers may face sanctions such as retraction of papers, funding withdrawal, or even dismissal from academic positions.
#### 3. Wasted Resources
Duplicate publication and research misconduct waste valuable resources, in
Evolution of Public Administration in Indian Context
1. Political Science
MOOC on Administration and Public Policy:
Concepts and Theories
Module- 2
Evolution of Public Administration
2. Evolution of Public Administration
Contents:
1) Evolution
2) Different Phases and Stages of Evolution
3) The Recent Trends in the study of Public
Administration
4)Conclusion
3. Evolution: The Beginning
• Public administration as an academic
discipline originated and emerged in the USA.
• It was the seminal essay entitled ‘The Study
of Public Administration’ published in the
‘Political Science Quarterly’ in 1887.
• It was written by Woodrow Wilson and that is
considered to be its symbolic beginning as a
field of study.
5. The Phases
• The evolution of the subject as a specialized field
of study can be studied into five phases
chronologically:
• Stage 1: Politics administration dichotomy (1887-
1926)
• Stage 2: Principles of administration (1927-1937)
• Stage 3: Era of challenge (1938-1947)
• Stage 4: Crises of identity (1948-1970)
• Stage 5: Public policy perspective (1971
onwards)
6. Stage 1: Politics Administration dichotomy (1887-
1926)
• The first stage of evolution of the discipline was
the manifestation of Woodrow Wilson’s view of
politics - administration dichotomy.
• Functionally, administration was separated from
politics and concerned itself with implementation
of policy decisions taken politically.
7. Stage 1: Politics Administration dichotomy (1887-1926)
• Beyond this distinction, the institutional locations
of these two functions were differentiated.
• The location of politics was identified as the
legislature .
• The location of administration was accepted as
the executive arm of government, the
bureaucracy.
• There must be a separation between Politics and
Administration.
8. Stage 2: Principles of administration (1927-1937)
• The second stage of evolution was marked by the
same fervour of reinforcing the Wilsonian view of
public-administration dichotomy.
• It tried to evolve a value-neutral or rather a value
free science of management.
• The Context of Industrial Revolution demanded for
efficiency and higher production which also led to
the development of universal principles of
management.
9. Era of Principles
• During this time, the structures and processes of
public organizations were put to a serious
rigorous analysis.
• Scientific methods, efficiency and economy of
the organizations were given importance.
• In short, the years 1927-1937 were the golden
years of ‘principles’ in the history of Public
Administration.
10. Stage 3: Era of challenge (1938-1947)
• The advocates of the principles of administration
began soon to be challenged and the period from
1938 to 1947 .
• The principles and iron cage/mechanistic view of
administration and workers were challenged
during this time.
• The principal challenge came from Human
Relations Theory.
11. Human Relations Theory
• The famous Hawthorne experiments conducted
by Elton Mayo and his colleagues at the
Hawthorne Plant of the Western Electric
Company Harvard Business School in the late 20’s
and early 30’s of the twentieth century shook the
foundation of the scientific management school.
• It demonstrated demonstrating the powerful
influence of social and psychological factors on
the work situation of the industrial workers.
12. Psychological Man against the Machine
• The stage was also spearheaded by two significant
publications of the 1940s – Herbert Simon’s
Administrative Behaviour and Robert Dahl’s essay
entitled The Science of Public Administration: Three
Problems.
• Dahl spoke against the ‘machine’ concept of
organization and argued that the study of
administration must embrace the whole
psychological man.
13. Stage 4: Crises of identity (1948-1970)
• This period has been one of crisis of identity for
Public Administration.
• Thus grew a need to reinvent public
administration and lead to a question as to
whether public administration that had been
known as it is till then was relevant anymore.
14. Rise of New Public Administration
• So, Public Administration, naturally, was in search
of an alternative and the alternative was available
in the form of administrative science.
• Thus was born the concept of Dwight Waldo’s
‘New Public Administration’ from the First
Minnowbrook Conference in 1968.
• Actually, the term New Public Administration
found circulation with two publications in 1971.
15. Features of the New Public Administration
• Relevance: There had been renewed emphasis on
being relevant to the societal problems.
• Values: New Public Administration brought values
back into the realm of Public Administration.
16. Main Themes
• Equity: The performance of Public Administration
was to be judged not in terms of growth but it
had to be sensitive to the aspect of equity.
• Change: As opposed to status quo, the new Public
Administration emphasized change.
17. Stage 5: Public Policy Perspective (1971 onwards)
• Despite the uncertainty and turmoil of the
preceding period, Public Administration did
register progress and entered the 1970s with an
enriched vision.
• At this stage, Public Administration began to draw
on a variety of disciplines such as Political
Science, Sociology and Economics.
18. Public-Policy Aspect
• The discipline gradually and progressively has
drifted more towards social problem-solving and
has been focusing on the dynamics of
administration.
• In the late 1980s, there was emergence of New
Public Management .
• New Public Management treats individuals as
"customers" or "clients" (in the private sector
sense), rather than as citizens.
19. Recent Trends
• Public - Private Partnership
• Movement towards political economy:
• New emerging goals of Public Administration:
20. New Trends
• Human Relations approach in Public
Administration
• People's participation decision making
• These trends have enriched the study of Public
Administration.
21. Conclusion
• Under Liberalization, Privatization and
Globalization (LPG), the bureaucracy of a country
has to play an open and competitive role.
• Under these new reforms Public Administration
has to play the role of an enabler, collaborator
and facilitator.